Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 129: 19-31, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2233821

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the immunogenicity and safety of fractional (half) third doses of heterologous COVID-19 vaccines (AZD1222 or BNT162b2) to full doses after the two-dose CoronaVac and when boosting after three different extended intervals. METHODS: At 60-<90, 90-<120, or 120-180 days intervals after the two-dose CoronaVac, participants were randomized to full-dose or half-dose AZD1222 or BNT162b2, followed up at day 28, 60, and 90. Vaccination-induced immune responses to Ancestral, Delta, and Omicron BA.1 strains were evaluated by antispike, pseudovirus, and microneutralization and T cell assays. Descriptive statistics and noninferiority cut-offs were reported as geometric mean concentration or titer and concentration or titer ratios comparing baseline to day 28 and day 90 and different intervals. RESULTS: No safety concerns were detected. All assays and intervals showed noninferior immunogenicity between full doses and half doses. However, full-dose vaccines and/or longer 120-180-day intervals substantially improved the immunogenicity (measured by antispike or measured by pseudotyped virus neutralizing titers 50; P <0.001). Seroconversion rates were over 90% against the SARS-CoV-2 strains by all assays. Immunogenicity waned more quickly with half doses than full doses but remained high against the Ancestral or Delta strains. Against Omicron, the day 28 immunogenicity increased with longer intervals than shorter intervals for full-dose vaccines. CONCLUSION: Immune responses after day 28 when boosting at longer intervals after the two-dose CoronaVac was optimal. Half doses met the noninferiority criteria compared with the full dose by all the immune assays assessed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , RNA, Messenger , mRNA Vaccines , Antibodies, Viral , Antibodies, Neutralizing
2.
Vaccine ; 40(48): 6963-6970, 2022 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2082524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major global public health concern and several protective vaccines, or preventive/therapeutic approaches have been developed. Sinovac-CoronaVac, an inactivated whole virus vaccine, can protect against severe COVID-19 disease and hospitalization, but less is known whether it elicits long-term T cell responses and provides prolonged protection. METHODS: This is a longitudinal surveillance study of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG levels, neutralizing antibody levels (NAb), T cell subsets and activation, and memory B cells of 335 participants who received two doses of CoronaVac. SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgG levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while NAb were measured against two strains of SARS-CoV-2, the Wuhan and Delta variants. Activated T cells and subsets were identified by flow cytometry. Memory B and T cells were evaluated by enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot). FINDINGS: Two doses of CoronaVac elicited serum anti-RBD antibody response, elevated B cells with NAb capacity and CD4+ T cell-, but not CD8+ T cell-responses. Among the CD4+ T cells, CoronaVac activated mainly Th2 (CD4+ T) cells. Serum antibody levels significantly declined three months after the second dose. INTERPRETATION: CoronaVac mainly activated B cells but T cells, especially Th1 cells, were poorly activated. Activated T cells were mainly Th2 biased, demonstrating development of effector B cells but not long-lasting memory plasma cells. Taken together, these results suggest that protection with CoronaVac is short-lived and that a third booster dose of vaccine may improve protection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viral Vaccines , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Antibodies, Viral , Vaccination , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Th1 Cells , Vaccines, Inactivated
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(10)2022 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2066610

ABSTRACT

Primary series vaccination with BNT162b2 followed by a booster 5 months later has been recommended for healthy adolescents. We aimed to describe the immunogenicity in a fractional dose of BNT162b2. Adolescents aged 12-18 years were randomized into six arms for primary series administration: 3wPZ30/30 (reference group), 3wPZ30/20, 3wPZ20/20, 6wPZ30/30, 6wPZ30/20, and 6wPZ20/20 µg. A booster was given at 5 months after the second dose using either 10 or 15 µg of BNT162b2. Immunogenicity following vaccination was determined by IgG against receptor-binding domain (anti-S-RBD IgG; BAU/mL), surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT; %inhibition) and pseudovirus neutralization (pVNT;ID50) against Omicron. Non-inferiority criteria were defined as a lower boundary of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) being greater than 0.67. From September to October 2021, 118 adolescents with a median age (IQR) of 14.9 years (13.9-16.7) were enrolled. Fourteen days after the primary series, the geometric means (GMs) of anti-S-RBD IgG (BAU/mL) were 3090 (95% CI 2761-3460) in 3wPZ30/30. The GMRs of anti-S-RBD were: 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.97) in 3wPZ30/20; 1.00 (95% CI 0.83-1.20) in 3wPZ20/20; 1.37 (95% CI 1.13-1.65) in 6wPZ30/30; 1.24 (95% CI 1.02-1.50) in 6wPZ30/20; and 1.36 (1.13-1.64) in 6wPZ20/20. After a booster dose with 15 µg (n = 24) of BNT162b2, sVNT and pVNT against Omicron variant were 91.6 (95% CI 88.4-94.9) and 331 (95% CI 221-495), respectively. In the group that received 10 µg of BNT162b2 (n = 25), sVNT was 85.6 (95% CI 80.0-91.6) and pVNT was 397 (95% CI 267-590). Healthy adolescents had good immune responses to the fractional dose regimen of BNT162b2 and this may be considered as an alternative option.

4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 234, 2022 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1731520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ozone (O3) is an effective disinfectant agent that leaves no harmful residues. Due to the global health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical masks are in high demand, with some needing to be reused in certain regions. This study aims to evaluate the effects of O3 for pathogen disinfection on reused surgical masks in various conditions. METHODS: O3 generators, a modified PZ 2-4 for Air (2000 mg O3/L) and a modified PZ 7 -2HO for Air (500 mg O3/L), were used together with 1.063 m3 (0.68 × 0.68 × 2.3 m) and 0.456 m3 (0.68 × 0.68 × 1.15 m) acrylic boxes as well as a room-sized 56 m3 (4 × 4 × 3.5 m) box to provide 3 conditions for the disinfection of masks contaminated with enveloped RNA virus (105 FFU/mL), bacteria (103 CFU/mL) and fungi (102 spores/mL). RESULTS: The virucidal effects were 82.99% and 81.70% after 15 min of treatment with 2000 mg/L O3 at 1.063 m3 and 500 mg/L O3 at 0.456 m3, respectively. The viral killing effect was increased over time and reached more than 95% after 2 h of incubation in both conditions. By using 2000 mg/L O3 in a 1.063 m3 box, the growth of bacteria and fungi was found to be completely inhibited on surgical masks after 30 min and 2 h of treatment, respectively. Using a lower-dose O3 generator at 500 mg O3/L in 0.456 m3 provided lower efficiency, although the difference was not significant. Using O3 at 2000 mg O3/L or 500 mg O3/L in a 56 m3 room is efficient for the disinfection of all pathogens on the surface of reused surgical masks. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided the conditions for using O3 (500-2000 mg/L) to reduce pathogens and disinfect contaminated surgical masks, which might be applied to reduce the inappropriate usage of reused surgical masks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ozone , Disinfection , Humans , Ozone/pharmacology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL